According to the original code logic:
if (!nvdimm->num_flush) {
        flush_data_size += sizeof(void *);
        //nvdimm->num_flush is zero now, add 1) have no side effects
} else {
        flush_data_size += sizeof(void *);
1)      flush_data_size += nvdimm->num_flush * sizeof(void *);
}

Obviously, the above code snippet can be reduced to one statement:
flush_data_size += (nvdimm->num_flush + 1) * sizeof(void *);

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leiz...@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c | 5 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c b/drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c
index 7cf9c7d857909ce..49be115c9189eff 100644
--- a/drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c
+++ b/drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c
@@ -77,11 +77,8 @@ int nd_region_activate(struct nd_region *nd_region)
                }
 
                /* at least one null hint slot per-dimm for the "no-hint" case 
*/
-               flush_data_size += sizeof(void *);
+               flush_data_size += (nvdimm->num_flush + 1) * sizeof(void *);
                num_flush = min_not_zero(num_flush, nvdimm->num_flush);
-               if (!nvdimm->num_flush)
-                       continue;
-               flush_data_size += nvdimm->num_flush * sizeof(void *);
        }
        nvdimm_bus_unlock(&nd_region->dev);
 
-- 
1.8.3


Reply via email to