Hi.

The following (trivial) patch against 2.4.0 (but should apply cleanly
against 241p1) makes do_munmap only null our precious cache if the
pointer contained therein is invalidated by the unmapping. I doubt it
will make any measurable difference but it seems straightforward
enough to be done anyway.

Running kernel compiles and starting X/gnome with this patch raises my 
cache hit rate a couple of percentage points, and I have a feeling that
there might be work loads out there that hit this kernel path more often
that these.

Comments?


diff -aur linux-2.4.0-clean/mm/mmap.c linux/mm/mmap.c
--- linux-2.4.0-clean/mm/mmap.c Sat Dec 30 18:35:19 2000
+++ linux/mm/mmap.c     Tue Jan  9 23:30:03 2001
@@ -712,7 +712,10 @@
                if (mm->mmap_avl)
                        avl_remove(mpnt, &mm->mmap_avl);
        }
-       mm->mmap_cache = NULL;  /* Kill the cache. */
+       if (mm->mmap_cache && mm->mmap_cache->vm_start < addr+len 
+           && mm->mmap_cache->vm_end > addr)
+               mm->mmap_cache = NULL;  /* Kill the cache. */
+
        spin_unlock(&mm->page_table_lock);
 
        /* Ok - we have the memory areas we should free on the 'free' list,


-- 
Regards,
        Rasmus([EMAIL PROTECTED])

"It's like an Alcatraz around my neck."
-Boston mayor Menino on the shortage of city parking spaces
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to