Hi, On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 12:00:16AM +0100, Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > Andreas Mohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > And viewing from a quite problematic angle (card is in running PC, > > difficult to view) strongly seems to indicate a VT630_6_ (the "6" is > > quite clearly visible). > > This means that I currently cannot offer any mfct. date data however, > > unfortunately. > > Yeah. I think (feel or something) VIA does the usual thing with > revision numbers so rev 0x46 means always the same silicon (VT6306) > and rev 0x80 is always the same VT6307. There might be other > revisions but I think we won't find non-VT6306 rev 0x46 or > non-VT6307 rev 0x80.
OK, PC was off now (good to be using S2D instead of S2R ;), the card data is: "SN1394", "STARNET V1.0" mfct.: 0450 VIA VT6306 0449CD TAIWAN 2HG1002703 (IOW, a moderately new VT6306 card) SEEPROM: ATMEL 418 93C46 PI27 A I'm only an occasional Firewire user (external backup HDD, miniDV grabbing), but I'm very thankful for your nice investigations! Andreas Mohr - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
