On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 06:03:53PM +0100, Stefan Traby wrote: > Really, the 255-limit is essential as long as "struct dirent/64" has > d_name[255] hard coded. Somebody should send Drepper a patch; sorry, d_name[256], not 255 in both, glibc and kernel... -- Stefan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [reiserfs-list] major security bug in reiserfs (m... Alexander Viro
- Re: [reiserfs-list] major security bug in reiser... Chris Mason
- Re: [reiserfs-list] major security bug in re... Alexander Viro
- Re: [reiserfs-list] major security bug i... Chris Mason
- Re: [reiserfs-list] major security b... Alexander Viro
- Re: [reiserfs-list] major security bug in reiser... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [reiserfs-list] major security bug in reiserfs (m... Vladimir V. Saveliev
- Re: [reiserfs-list] major security bug in reiser... Chris Mason
- Re: [reiserfs-list] major security bug in re... Vladimir V. Saveliev
- Re: [reiserfs-list] major security bug in reiser... Stefan Traby
- Re: [reiserfs-list] major security bug in re... Stefan Traby
- Re: [reiserfs-list] major security bug in reiserfs (m... Chris Mason