On Fri, 2020-08-07 at 16:14 +0200, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: > On 31/07/2020 09:42, Rik van Riel wrote: > > Possible solution > > ... > I imagine that I can see what you want to achieve here ;-) > > But it's hard since your v5 RFC > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190906191237.27006-1-r...@surriel.com is > pretty old by now.
The v5 patches also do not implement this new idea, and still suffer from the corner cases that Paul Turner pointed out last year. > Do you have a version of the patch-set against tip/sched/core? Quite > a > lot has changed (runnable load avg replaced by runnable avg, rq->load > is > gone, CFS load balance rework). Not yet. We got a baby this spring, so I've been busy with things like milk and diapers, instead of with code. I wanted to get this proposal out before Plumbers, so we could at least talk about it, and maybe find flaws with this idea before I spend weeks/months implementing it :) > IMHO it would be extremely helpful to have a current patch-set to > discuss how these other problems can be covered by patches on top. Agreed. I hope to get some time to work on that, but no guarantees about getting it ready before Plumbers :) -- All Rights Reversed.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
