On Thu, 2020-08-06 at 10:12 +0000, Avri Altman wrote: > > > > > > > we didn't see you Acked-by in the pathwork, would you like to add > > them? > > Just for reminding us that you have agreed to mainline this series > > patchset. > > I acked it - https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg144660.html > And asked Martin to move forward - > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg144738.html > Which he did, and got some sparse errors: > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg144977.html > Which I asked Daejun to fix - > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg144987.html > > For the next chain of events I guess you can follow by yourself. > > Thanks, > Avri
Avri Sorry for making you confusing. yes, I knew that, and following. I mean Acked-by tag in the patchset, then we see your acked in the patchwork, and let others know that you acked it, rather than going backtrack history email. Hi Daejun I think you can add Avri's Acked-by tag in your patchset, just for quickly moving forward and reminding. thanks, Bean
