Re: [PATCH v3] cpufreq: CPPC: simply the code access 'highest_perf' value in cppc_perf_caps struct

[Xin Hao]

Hi everyone:

I want to know why my patch didn't merge into upstream ?


Thanks

在 2020/7/1 下午12:20, Xin Hao 写道:

  The 'caps' variable has been defined, so there is no need to get
  'highest_perf' value through 'cpu->caps.highest_perf', you can use
  'caps->highest_perf' instead.

Signed-off-by: Xin Hao <x...@linux.alibaba.com>
---
  drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
index 257d726a4456..051d0e56c67a 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(struct 
cppc_cpudata *cpu,
                if (!max_khz)
                        max_khz = cppc_get_dmi_max_khz();
                mul = max_khz;
-               div = cpu->perf_caps.highest_perf;
+               div = caps->highest_perf;
        }
        return (u64)perf * mul / div;
  }
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_khz_to_perf(struct 
cppc_cpudata *cpu,
        } else {
                if (!max_khz)
                        max_khz = cppc_get_dmi_max_khz();
-               mul = cpu->perf_caps.highest_perf;
+               mul = caps->highest_perf;
                div = max_khz;
        }