Trond Myklebust wrote:
> Doh. You're quite right on both accounts. I made a small modification
> to your patch for the rpc_new_task() problem (you forgot to release
> the RPC task if it's not used).
>
> Linus, please apply for 2.4.1...
Thanks guys! I'm testing it now, and so far, so good. I've merged
Andrew's and Trond's patches into one:
*******************************************
--- linux-2.4.0/fs/nfs/flushd.c.orig Wed Jan 10 07:18:32 2001
+++ linux-2.4.0/fs/nfs/flushd.c Wed Jan 10 07:18:38 2001
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
/*
* Spinlock
*/
-spinlock_t nfs_flushd_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
+static spinlock_t nfs_flushd_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
/*
* Local function declarations.
@@ -71,18 +71,17 @@
int status = 0;
dprintk("NFS: writecache_init\n");
+
+ /* Create the RPC task */
+ if (!(task = rpc_new_task(server->client, NULL,
RPC_TASK_ASYNC)))
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
spin_lock(&nfs_flushd_lock);
cache = server->rw_requests;
if (cache->task)
goto out_unlock;
- /* Create the RPC task */
- status = -ENOMEM;
- task = rpc_new_task(server->client, NULL, RPC_TASK_ASYNC);
- if (!task)
- goto out_unlock;
-
task->tk_calldata = server;
cache->task = task;
@@ -99,6 +98,7 @@
return 0;
out_unlock:
spin_unlock(&nfs_flushd_lock);
+ rpc_release_task(task);
return status;
}
@@ -195,7 +195,9 @@
if (*q) {
*q = inode->u.nfs_i.hash_next;
NFS_FLAGS(inode) &= ~NFS_INO_FLUSH;
+ spin_unlock(&nfs_flushd_lock);
iput(inode);
+ return;
}
out:
spin_unlock(&nfs_flushd_lock);
*******************************************
Brian O'Keefe
Spinnaker Networks, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
