Re: [PATCH 06/15] iio: sx9310: Align memory

[Daniel Campello]

On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 12:11 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevche...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 6:15 PM Daniel Campello <campe...@chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> > Use __aligned(8) to ensure that the timestamp is correctly aligned
> > when we call push_to_buffers
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Campello <campe...@chromium.org>
> > ---
> >
> >  drivers/iio/proximity/sx9310.c | 6 +++---
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9310.c b/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9310.c
> > index de52afd7c13333..fb5c16f2aa6b1a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9310.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9310.c
> > @@ -131,8 +131,8 @@ struct sx9310_data {
> >          */
> >         bool prox_stat[SX9310_NUM_CHANNELS];
> >         bool trigger_enabled;
> > -       __be16 buffer[SX9310_NUM_CHANNELS +
> > -                     4]; /* 64-bit data + 64-bit timestamp */
> > +       /* 64-bit data + 64-bit timestamp buffer */
> > +       __be16 buffer[SX9310_NUM_CHANNELS + 4] __aligned(8);
>
> If the data amount (channels) is always the same, please, use struct approach.
> Otherwise put a comment explaining dynamic data.
I'm not sure what you mean here. I have a comment above for the size
of the array.
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko