From: Johannes Berg <johannes.b...@intel.com> commit fbb1461ad1d6eacca9beb69a2f3ce1b5398d399b upstream.
iwl_mvm_free_inactive_queue() will sleep in synchronize_net() under some circumstances, so don't call it under RCU. There doesn't appear to be a need for RCU protection around this particular call. Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org # v5.4+ Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.b...@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coe...@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kv...@codeaurora.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20200403112332.0f49448c133d.I17fd308bc4a9491859c9b112f4eb5d2c3fc18d7d@changeid Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> --- drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/sta.c | 8 +++----- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/sta.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/sta.c @@ -1184,17 +1184,15 @@ static int iwl_mvm_inactivity_check(stru for_each_set_bit(i, &changetid_queues, IWL_MAX_HW_QUEUES) iwl_mvm_change_queue_tid(mvm, i); + rcu_read_unlock(); + if (free_queue >= 0 && alloc_for_sta != IWL_MVM_INVALID_STA) { ret = iwl_mvm_free_inactive_queue(mvm, free_queue, queue_owner, alloc_for_sta); - if (ret) { - rcu_read_unlock(); + if (ret) return ret; - } } - rcu_read_unlock(); - return free_queue; }
