On Tuesday 30 October 2007, David Brownell wrote: > > > > was there something that caught your eye other than the ugly udelay() > > you mentioned in the other thread ? > > That one was a feature that might be more generally necessary, > just to meet chip timing specs. Mostly they're no trouble. >
... although I note that the referenced thread suggested maybe the problem there was a missing pullup on the chipselect line. If that was really the cause, then I think that feature would best be left out of the framework. :) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
