On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 18:58 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> James Bottomley wrote:
> >> >  struct attribute_group {
> >> >          const char              *name;
> >> > +        int                     (*filter_show)(struct kobject *, int);
> 
> > Actually, it returns a true/false value indicating whether the given
> > attribute should be displayed.
> 
> How about this:
> 
>       int (*is_visible)(...);

OK, so is this latest revision acceptable to everyone?

James

Index: BUILD-2.6/fs/sysfs/group.c
===================================================================
--- BUILD-2.6.orig/fs/sysfs/group.c     2007-10-28 17:27:04.000000000 -0500
+++ BUILD-2.6/fs/sysfs/group.c  2007-10-30 12:35:47.000000000 -0500
@@ -16,25 +16,31 @@
 #include "sysfs.h"
 
 
-static void remove_files(struct sysfs_dirent *dir_sd,
+static void remove_files(struct sysfs_dirent *dir_sd, struct kobject *kobj,
                         const struct attribute_group *grp)
 {
        struct attribute *const* attr;
+       int i;
 
-       for (attr = grp->attrs; *attr; attr++)
-               sysfs_hash_and_remove(dir_sd, (*attr)->name);
+       for (i = 0, attr = grp->attrs; *attr; i++, attr++)
+               if (grp->is_visible &&
+                   grp->is_visible(kobj, *attr, i))
+                       sysfs_hash_and_remove(dir_sd, (*attr)->name);
 }
 
-static int create_files(struct sysfs_dirent *dir_sd,
+static int create_files(struct sysfs_dirent *dir_sd, struct kobject *kobj,
                        const struct attribute_group *grp)
 {
        struct attribute *const* attr;
-       int error = 0;
+       int error = 0, i;
 
-       for (attr = grp->attrs; *attr && !error; attr++)
-               error = sysfs_add_file(dir_sd, *attr, SYSFS_KOBJ_ATTR);
+       for (i = 0, attr = grp->attrs; *attr && !error; i++, attr++)
+               if (grp->is_visible &&
+                   grp->is_visible(kobj, *attr, i))
+                       error |=
+                               sysfs_add_file(dir_sd, *attr, SYSFS_KOBJ_ATTR);
        if (error)
-               remove_files(dir_sd, grp);
+               remove_files(dir_sd, kobj, grp);
        return error;
 }
 
@@ -54,7 +60,7 @@ int sysfs_create_group(struct kobject * 
        } else
                sd = kobj->sd;
        sysfs_get(sd);
-       error = create_files(sd, grp);
+       error = create_files(sd, kobj, grp);
        if (error) {
                if (grp->name)
                        sysfs_remove_subdir(sd);
@@ -75,7 +81,7 @@ void sysfs_remove_group(struct kobject *
        } else
                sd = sysfs_get(dir_sd);
 
-       remove_files(sd, grp);
+       remove_files(sd, kobj, grp);
        if (grp->name)
                sysfs_remove_subdir(sd);
 
Index: BUILD-2.6/include/linux/sysfs.h
===================================================================
--- BUILD-2.6.orig/include/linux/sysfs.h        2007-10-28 17:20:06.000000000 
-0500
+++ BUILD-2.6/include/linux/sysfs.h     2007-10-30 13:24:06.000000000 -0500
@@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ struct attribute {
 
 struct attribute_group {
        const char              *name;
+       int                     (*is_visible)(struct kobject *,
+                                             struct attribute *, int);
        struct attribute        **attrs;
 };
 
Index: BUILD-2.6/kernel/params.c
===================================================================
--- BUILD-2.6.orig/kernel/params.c      2007-10-29 01:18:43.000000000 -0500
+++ BUILD-2.6/kernel/params.c   2007-10-29 01:18:49.000000000 -0500
@@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ param_sysfs_setup(struct module_kobject 
                        sizeof(mp->grp.attrs[0]));
        size[1] = (valid_attrs + 1) * sizeof(mp->grp.attrs[0]);
 
-       mp = kmalloc(size[0] + size[1], GFP_KERNEL);
+       mp = kzalloc(size[0] + size[1], GFP_KERNEL);
        if (!mp)
                return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to