On Friday 17 Jul 2020 at 11:33:05 (+0100), Quentin Perret wrote: > On Friday 17 Jul 2020 at 11:14:38 (+0100), Quentin Perret wrote: > > On Tuesday 14 Jul 2020 at 12:06:53 (+0530), Viresh Kumar wrote: > > > /** > > > - * get_load() - get load for a cpu since last updated > > > + * get_load() - get current load for a cpu > > > * @cpufreq_cdev: &struct cpufreq_cooling_device for this cpu > > > * @cpu: cpu number > > > - * @cpu_idx: index of the cpu in time_in_idle* > > > + * @cpu_idx: index of the cpu > > > * > > > - * Return: The average load of cpu @cpu in percentage since this > > > - * function was last called. > > > + * Return: The current load of cpu @cpu in percentage. > > > */ > > > static u32 get_load(struct cpufreq_cooling_device *cpufreq_cdev, int cpu, > > > int cpu_idx) > > > { > > > - u32 load; > > > - u64 now, now_idle, delta_time, delta_idle; > > > - struct time_in_idle *idle_time = &cpufreq_cdev->idle_time[cpu_idx]; > > > - > > > - now_idle = get_cpu_idle_time(cpu, &now, 0); > > > - delta_idle = now_idle - idle_time->time; > > > - delta_time = now - idle_time->timestamp; > > > + unsigned long util = cpu_util_cfs(cpu_rq(cpu)); > > > + unsigned long max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu); > > > > Should we subtract the thermal PELT signal from max? > > Actually, that or add it the ENERGY_UTIL case in effective_cpu_util() as > this appears to be missing for EAS too ...
Scratch that. I do think there is something missing in the EAS path, but not sure that would fix it. I'll have a think and stop spamming everybody in the meantime ... The first question is still valid, though :) Sorry for the noise, Quentin