Hi Adrian, On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 1:14 AM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > However, independent of Christoph's series, the kernels throws two backtraces > during > boot which I think should require a git bisect (unless I missed a > configuration option > as I trimmed down the kernel a bit to make sure it's not too big). > > See the traces below and let me know what you think.
> [ 1.560000] sh-sci.1: ttySC1 at MMIO 0xffeb0000 (irq = 44, base_baud = 0) > is a scif > [ 1.560000] BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0, swapper/1 > [ 1.560000] lock: sci_ports+0x1d8/0xb10, .magic: 00000000, .owner: > <none>/-1, .owner_cpu: 0 [PATCH v1] serial: core: Initialise spin lock before use in uart_configure_port() https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200706140036.75524-1-andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com > [ 1.560000] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper Not tainted > 5.8.0-rc5-00026-g22b7a96ece82 #3 > [ 1.560000] Stack: (0x9f445ce8 to 0x9f446000) > [ 1.560000] 5ce0: > [ 1.560000] > [ 1.560000] > [ 1.560000] 80260daa > [ 1.560000] 9f445cfc > [ 1.560000] 80048fd8 > [ 1.560000] 8096c158 > [ 1.560000] 805ab908 > [ 1.560000] 8004449c Any plans to take "[PATCH v2 0/9] sh: Modernize printing of kernel messages"? https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200617143639.18315-1-geert+rene...@glider.be > [ 5.464000] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at mm/slab.c:2589 > cache_alloc_refill+0x216/0x6a0 > [ 5.464000] Modules linked in: > [ 5.464000] > [ 5.464000] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper Not tainted > 5.8.0-rc5-00026-g22b7a96ece82 #3 > [ 5.464000] PC is at cache_alloc_refill+0x216/0x6a0 > [ 5.464000] PR is at kmem_cache_alloc+0xd6/0x128 > [ 5.464000] PC : 800ec0d2 SP : 9f445e68 SR : 400080f0 > [ 5.464000] TEA : c00c30d0 > [ 5.464000] R0 : 8062724c R1 : 8000fee8 R2 : 9f403540 R3 : 00000100 > [ 5.464000] R4 : 9f403500 R5 : 00000000 R6 : 8068d5b0 R7 : 007fffff > [ 5.464000] R8 : 0000000c R9 : 9f403500 R10 : 8096fc0c R11 : 80044410 > [ 5.464000] R12 : 9f405060 R13 : 00000dc0 R14 : 9f445e68 > [ 5.464000] MACH: 10623bba MACL: 00000cc0 GBR : 2957bd58 PR : 800ec80a > [ 5.464000] > [ 5.464000] Call trace: > [ 5.464000] [<(ptrval)>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x0/0x54 > [ 5.464000] [<(ptrval)>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x0/0x44 > [ 5.464000] [<(ptrval)>] kmem_cache_alloc+0xd6/0x128 > [ 5.464000] [<(ptrval)>] arch_local_irq_restore+0x0/0x2c > [ 5.464000] [<(ptrval)>] __raw_spin_lock_init+0x0/0x1c > [ 5.464000] [<(ptrval)>] pgd_alloc+0x10/0x24 Does commit 73c348f31b63d28d ("sh: Fix unneeded constructor in page table allocation") in next-20200710 and later fix that? Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
