On Tue, 2020-07-14 at 15:21 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
[...]
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 10:22 AM Sumeet Pawnikar
> <sumeet.r.pawni...@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Srinivas, does the patch look good to you?
Some minor comments then Summet can add my
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <
srinivas.pandruv...@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Addressed review comments from Rafael.
> > - Made the commit message more clearer.
> > - Updated powercap documentation.
> > ---
> >
[...]
> > 0,1).
> > +Depending on different power zones, the Intel RAPL technology
> > allows
> > +one or multiple constraints like short term, long term and peak
> > power,
> > +with different time windows to be applied to each power zone.
I think better to spell out that time window is not applicable to "peak
power". Otherwise someone will send a bug report.
[...]
> > static int rapl_msr_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > int ret;
> > + const struct x86_cpu_id *id =
> > x86_match_cpu(pl4_support_ids);
To match coding style in this file:
const struct x86_cpu_id *id = x86_match_cpu(pl4_support_ids);
int ret;
> > rapl_msr_priv.read_raw = rapl_msr_read_raw;
Thanks,
Srinivas
