From: David Rientjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 02:42:30 -0700 (PDT)
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > > > 2) There is no such thing as const task_struct. Anyone who think otherwise > > deserves compiler warning. > > > > A 'const struct task_struct *' can be used as an annotation to mean that > no member of the struct is modified through that pointer, so it's > perfectly acceptable to qualify formals in that manner. But in one of the cases he un-const's the code does modify the object through the pointer. At least that one should be reverted since the annotation is wrong. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
