>You could try the Intel driver (e100.c), which is downloadable from their >website. It apparently has some silicon bug workarounds that Donald's >driver hasn't. We've been back and forth with that driver, yeah. It has its own set of problems, sometimes it doesnt even autonegotiate properly, falls to 10 half duplex, etc. It also seems to have gotten quite large code wise (code wise) in the latest version (1.3.x.something) :) We dont need any of their ans/teaming/proc stuff, but it is stable on this particular problem. Their driver doesnt even compile out of the box on 2.2.18 btw (intel e100.c 1.3.2, latest I could find), _badudelay. I had to change one call to mdelay, and comment out their dma_addr_t type because of the conflicting declaration. Doesnt give me much confidence :( >Also please note that such a subject line is not a good motivation to help >you for free. >-Andi Sorry. It wasnt my subject though, I was replying to someone else and just put the 'Re:' in. But I will be more careful... _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
