>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c?id=42f82040ee66db13525dc6f14b8559890b2f4c1c#n980 >> >> if (!virtscsi_cmd_cache) { >> pr_err("kmem_cache_create() for virtscsi_cmd_cache failed\n"); >> - goto error; >> + return -ENOMEM; >> } > > Could be doable, but I don't see a particular benefit.
Can a bit more “compliance” (with the Linux coding style) matter here? > Having a single error loop is an advantage by itself. I do not see that a loop is involved in the implementation of the function “init”. >> destroy_pool: >> mempool_destroy(virtscsi_cmd_pool); >> virtscsi_cmd_pool = NULL; >> destroy_cache: >> kmem_cache_destroy(virtscsi_cmd_cache); >> virtscsi_cmd_cache = NULL; >> return ret; > > ... while there's no advantage in this. I propose again to improve the affected exception handling another bit by using appropriate labels. Will further software improvements be achieved by a corresponding patch series? Regards, Markus
