Hi Lorenzo, This 6/6 patch has just been covered with the following patch: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-pci/patch/20200708164013.5076-1-zhengdej...@gmail.com/
As a result, my other patches conflict with this patch. I'd like your comments in the patch 2/6, though, should I rebase to pci/dwc and resend this series without 6/6? Thank you, On 2020/06/18 17:38, Kunihiko Hayashi wrote:
Use devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname() to simplify the code a bit. Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunih...@socionext.com>f --- drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c index 8356dd3..233d624 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c @@ -456,8 +456,7 @@ static int uniphier_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (IS_ERR(priv->pci.atu_base)) priv->pci.atu_base = NULL;- res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "link");- priv->base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res); + priv->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "link"); if (IS_ERR(priv->base)) return PTR_ERR(priv->base);
--- Best Regards Kunihiko Hayashi
