On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 11:21:29PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
> Now that there are USXGMII constants available, drop the old definitions
> and reuse the generic ones.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <mich...@walle.cc>
> ---
> drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix_vsc9959.c | 45 +++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix_vsc9959.c
> b/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix_vsc9959.c
> index 19614537b1ba..4310b1527022 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix_vsc9959.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix_vsc9959.c
> @@ -10,35 +10,15 @@
> #include <soc/mscc/ocelot.h>
> #include <net/pkt_sched.h>
> #include <linux/iopoll.h>
> +#include <linux/mdio.h>
> #include <linux/pci.h>
> #include "felix.h"
>
> #define VSC9959_VCAP_IS2_CNT 1024
> #define VSC9959_VCAP_IS2_ENTRY_WIDTH 376
> #define VSC9959_VCAP_PORT_CNT 6
> -
> -/* TODO: should find a better place for these */
> -#define USXGMII_BMCR_RESET BIT(15)
> -#define USXGMII_BMCR_AN_EN BIT(12)
> -#define USXGMII_BMCR_RST_AN BIT(9)
> -#define USXGMII_BMSR_LNKS(status) (((status) & GENMASK(2, 2)) >> 2)
> -#define USXGMII_BMSR_AN_CMPL(status) (((status) & GENMASK(5, 5)) >> 5)
> -#define USXGMII_ADVERTISE_LNKS(x) (((x) << 15) & BIT(15))
> -#define USXGMII_ADVERTISE_FDX BIT(12)
> -#define USXGMII_ADVERTISE_SPEED(x) (((x) << 9) & GENMASK(11, 9))
> -#define USXGMII_LPA_LNKS(lpa) ((lpa) >> 15)
> -#define USXGMII_LPA_DUPLEX(lpa) (((lpa) & GENMASK(12, 12)) >>
> 12)
> -#define USXGMII_LPA_SPEED(lpa) (((lpa) & GENMASK(11, 9)) >> 9)
> -
> #define VSC9959_TAS_GCL_ENTRY_MAX 63
>
> -enum usxgmii_speed {
> - USXGMII_SPEED_10 = 0,
> - USXGMII_SPEED_100 = 1,
> - USXGMII_SPEED_1000 = 2,
> - USXGMII_SPEED_2500 = 4,
> -};
> -
> static const u32 vsc9959_ana_regmap[] = {
> REG(ANA_ADVLEARN, 0x0089a0),
> REG(ANA_VLANMASK, 0x0089a4),
> @@ -787,11 +767,10 @@ static void vsc9959_pcs_config_usxgmii(struct
> phy_device *pcs,
> {
> /* Configure device ability for the USXGMII Replicator */
> phy_write_mmd(pcs, MDIO_MMD_VEND2, MII_ADVERTISE,
> - USXGMII_ADVERTISE_SPEED(USXGMII_SPEED_2500) |
> - USXGMII_ADVERTISE_LNKS(1) |
> + MDIO_LPA_USXGMII_2500FULL |
> + MDIO_LPA_USXGMII_LINK |
> ADVERTISE_SGMII |
> - ADVERTISE_LPACK |
> - USXGMII_ADVERTISE_FDX);
> + ADVERTISE_LPACK);
> }
>
> static void vsc9959_pcs_config(struct ocelot *ocelot, int port,
> @@ -1005,8 +984,8 @@ static void vsc9959_pcs_link_state_usxgmii(struct
> phy_device *pcs,
> return;
>
> pcs->autoneg = true;
> - pcs->autoneg_complete = USXGMII_BMSR_AN_CMPL(status);
> - pcs->link = USXGMII_BMSR_LNKS(status);
> + pcs->autoneg_complete = status & BMSR_ANEGCOMPLETE;
> + pcs->link = status & BMSR_LSTATUS;
These are "unsigned :1" in struct phy_device, and not booleans. I'm not
sure how the compiler is going to treat this assignment of an integer.
I have a feeling it may not do the right thing. Could you please do
this?
pcs->autoneg_complete = !!(status & BMSR_ANEGCOMPLETE);
pcs->link = !!(status & BMSR_LSTATUS);
>
> if (!pcs->link || !pcs->autoneg_complete)
> return;
> @@ -1015,24 +994,24 @@ static void vsc9959_pcs_link_state_usxgmii(struct
> phy_device *pcs,
> if (lpa < 0)
> return;
>
> - switch (USXGMII_LPA_SPEED(lpa)) {
> - case USXGMII_SPEED_10:
> + switch (lpa & MDIO_LPA_USXGMII_SPD_MASK) {
> + case MDIO_LPA_USXGMII_10:
> pcs->speed = SPEED_10;
> break;
> - case USXGMII_SPEED_100:
> + case MDIO_LPA_USXGMII_100:
> pcs->speed = SPEED_100;
> break;
> - case USXGMII_SPEED_1000:
> + case MDIO_LPA_USXGMII_1000:
> pcs->speed = SPEED_1000;
> break;
> - case USXGMII_SPEED_2500:
> + case MDIO_LPA_USXGMII_2500:
> pcs->speed = SPEED_2500;
> break;
> default:
> break;
> }
>
> - if (USXGMII_LPA_DUPLEX(lpa))
> + if (lpa & MDIO_LPA_USXGMII_FULL_DUPLEX)
> pcs->duplex = DUPLEX_FULL;
> else
> pcs->duplex = DUPLEX_HALF;
> --
> 2.20.1
>
Thanks,
-Vladimir
