On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 3:34 AM Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 04:25:41PM -0700, Song Liu wrote: > > Hi Christoph, > > > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 5:53 AM Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de> wrote: > > > > > > The only caller of the bstat function becomes cleaner and simpler when > > > open coding the function. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de> > > > > Thanks for the set. md parts of the set look good to me. > > > > How should we route this set, as it touches multiple subsystems? > > Good question as there is no really applicable tree. One option > would the vfs tree as it toucheѕ some VFS stuff, and the follow on > series that depends on it is all about VFS bits. Alternatively I > could set up a tree just for these bits. The important bit is that > it doesn't go into the -mm tree as the usual catchall, as I have > more stuff that depends on it and requires a git tree.
Would this official mm tree work? T: git git://github.com/hnaz/linux-mm.git If not, I am OK with either vfs tree or a dedicated tree. Thanks, Song
