> Hmm, can we simply do
>
> static inline int test_and_set_bit_lock(int nr, volatile unsigned long * addr)
> {
> return test_and_set_bit(nr, addr);
> }
>
> please ?
Certainly. That does look better.
---
From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Use duplicated inline functions for test_and_set_bit_lock() on x86
instead of #define macros, thus avoiding a bad example. This allows
kernel-doc to run cleanly instead of terminating with an error:
Error(linux-2.6.24-rc1//include/asm-x86/bitops_32.h:188): cannot understand
prototype: 'test_and_set_bit_lock test_and_set_bit '
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/asm-x86/bitops_32.h | 7 +++++--
include/asm-x86/bitops_64.h | 7 +++++--
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.24-rc1.orig/include/asm-x86/bitops_32.h
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc1/include/asm-x86/bitops_32.h
@@ -183,9 +183,12 @@ static inline int test_and_set_bit(int n
* @nr: Bit to set
* @addr: Address to count from
*
- * This is the same as test_and_set_bit on x86
+ * This is the same as test_and_set_bit on x86.
*/
-#define test_and_set_bit_lock test_and_set_bit
+static inline int test_and_set_bit_lock(int nr, volatile unsigned long * addr)
+{
+ return test_and_set_bit(nr, addr);
+}
/**
* __test_and_set_bit - Set a bit and return its old value
--- linux-2.6.24-rc1.orig/include/asm-x86/bitops_64.h
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc1/include/asm-x86/bitops_64.h
@@ -173,9 +173,12 @@ static __inline__ int test_and_set_bit(i
* @nr: Bit to set
* @addr: Address to count from
*
- * This is the same as test_and_set_bit on x86
+ * This is the same as test_and_set_bit on x86.
*/
-#define test_and_set_bit_lock test_and_set_bit
+static __inline__ int test_and_set_bit_lock(int nr, volatile void * addr)
+{
+ return test_and_set_bit(nr, addr);
+}
/**
* __test_and_set_bit - Set a bit and return its old value
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
