From: Hyeongseok.Kim <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 4ba6ccd695f5ed3ae851e59b443b757bbe4557fe ]

Some fsck tool complain that padding part of the FileName field
is not set to the value 0000h. So let's maintain filesystem cleaner,
as exfat's spec. recommendation.

Signed-off-by: Hyeongseok.Kim <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
---
 fs/exfat/dir.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/exfat/dir.c b/fs/exfat/dir.c
index 4b91afb0f0515..349ca0c282c2c 100644
--- a/fs/exfat/dir.c
+++ b/fs/exfat/dir.c
@@ -430,10 +430,12 @@ static void exfat_init_name_entry(struct exfat_dentry *ep,
        ep->dentry.name.flags = 0x0;
 
        for (i = 0; i < EXFAT_FILE_NAME_LEN; i++) {
-               ep->dentry.name.unicode_0_14[i] = cpu_to_le16(*uniname);
-               if (*uniname == 0x0)
-                       break;
-               uniname++;
+               if (*uniname != 0x0) {
+                       ep->dentry.name.unicode_0_14[i] = cpu_to_le16(*uniname);
+                       uniname++;
+               } else {
+                       ep->dentry.name.unicode_0_14[i] = 0x0;
+               }
        }
 }
 
-- 
2.25.1



Reply via email to