On 10/25/07, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 08:06:14PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> we'll have to either use the gcc attributes to force old inline > >> behavior or use the gcc flag to force it > > > > We should probably have an extern_inline define then, assuming this is a > > function that does exist in a linkable version already -- otherwise "static > > inline" is correct. > > Since we #define inline to be __attribute__((always_inline)) > "extern inline" with the old semantics would only behave differently > if someone took the address of one of these string functions.
that isnt what we intended ;) > Does this happen anywhere in the blackfin port? gcc is also free to ignore the optimized inline in favor of an external reference -mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
