Hello Greg, Would you agree to take this series?
Regards. On 18/06/2020 13:38, Marc Gonzalez wrote: > Hello everyone, > > In my opinion, the small and simple devm_add() helper > (and its cousin, devm_vadd) can help make devm code > slightly easier to write and maintain. > > Would anyone care to agree or disagree? :-) > > Regards. > > On 10/03/2020 11:11, Marc Gonzalez wrote: > >> Differences from v4 to v5 >> x Fix the grammar in devm_add comments [Geert] >> x Undo an unrelated change in devm_clk_put [Geert] >> >> Differences from v3 to v4 >> x Add a bunch of kerneldoc above devm_add() [Greg KH] >> x Split patch in two [Greg KH] >> >> Differences from v2 to v3 >> x Make devm_add() return an error-code rather than the raw data pointer >> (in case devres_alloc ever returns an ERR_PTR) as suggested by Geert >> x Provide a variadic version devm_vadd() to work with structs as suggested >> by Geert >> x Don't use nested ifs in clk_devm* implementations (hopefully simpler >> code logic to follow) as suggested by Geert >> >> Marc Gonzalez (2): >> devres: Provide new helper for devm functions >> clk: Use devm_add in managed functions >> >> drivers/base/devres.c | 28 ++++++++++++ >> drivers/clk/clk-devres.c | 97 +++++++++++++++------------------------- >> include/linux/device.h | 3 ++ >> 3 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
