On 2020/7/3 4:09, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
Hi,

On 04/06/2020 20:33:01+0800, yu kuai wrote:
if of_find_device_by_node() succeed, at91_pm_sram_init() doesn't have
a corresponding put_device(). Thus add a jump target to fix the exception
handling for this function implementation.

Fixes: d2e467905596 ("ARM: at91: pm: use the mmio-sram pool to access SRAM")
Signed-off-by: yu kuai <[email protected]>
---
  arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c | 11 ++++++++---
  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
index 074bde64064e..2aab043441e8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
@@ -592,13 +592,13 @@ static void __init at91_pm_sram_init(void)
        sram_pool = gen_pool_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);

Isn't the best solution to simply have put_device hereHi, Alexandre !

I think put_device() is supposed to be called in the exception handling
path.


        if (!sram_pool) {
                pr_warn("%s: sram pool unavailable!\n", __func__);
-               return;
+               goto out_put_device;
        }
sram_base = gen_pool_alloc(sram_pool, at91_pm_suspend_in_sram_sz);
        if (!sram_base) {
                pr_warn("%s: unable to alloc sram!\n", __func__);
-               return;
+               goto out_put_device;
        }
sram_pbase = gen_pool_virt_to_phys(sram_pool, sram_base);
@@ -606,12 +606,17 @@ static void __init at91_pm_sram_init(void)
                                        at91_pm_suspend_in_sram_sz, false);
        if (!at91_suspend_sram_fn) {
                pr_warn("SRAM: Could not map\n");
-               return;
+               goto out_put_device;
        }
/* Copy the pm suspend handler to SRAM */
        at91_suspend_sram_fn = fncpy(at91_suspend_sram_fn,
                        &at91_pm_suspend_in_sram, at91_pm_suspend_in_sram_sz);

If nothing is wrong, maybe put_device shounld't be called?

Thanks!
Yu Kuai
+       return;
+
+out_put_device:
+       put_device(&pdev->dev);
+       return;
  }
static bool __init at91_is_pm_mode_active(int pm_mode)
--
2.25.4



Reply via email to