On 01-07-20, 11:26, Xin Hao wrote: > The 'caps' variable has been defined, so there is no need to get > 'highest_perf' value through 'cpu->caps.highest_perf', you can use > 'caps->highest_perf' instead. > > Signed-off-by: Xin Hao <x...@linux.alibaba.com> > --- > drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c > index 257d726a4456..444ee76a6bae 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c > @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(struct > cppc_cpudata *cpu, > if (!max_khz) > max_khz = cppc_get_dmi_max_khz(); > mul = max_khz; > - div = cpu->perf_caps.highest_perf; > + div = caps->highest_perf; > } > return (u64)perf * mul / div; > }
Applied. Thanks. -- viresh
