On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 12:38:13PM +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote:
Hi Philipp:
Thanks very much for your review!
> Hi Dejin,
>
> On Thu, 2020-06-04 at 23:30 +0800, Dejin Zheng wrote:
> > kernel test robot reports a compile warning about REG_OFFSET redefined
> > in the reset-intel-gw.c after merging commit e44ab4e14d6f4 ("regmap:
> > Simplify implementation of the regmap_read_poll_timeout() macro"). the
> > warning is like that:
> >
> > drivers/reset/reset-intel-gw.c:18:0: warning: "REG_OFFSET" redefined
> > #define REG_OFFSET GENMASK(31, 16)
> >
> > In file included from ./arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/hardware.h:30:0,
> > from ./arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/io.h:15,
> > from ./arch/arm/include/asm/io.h:198,
> > from ./include/linux/io.h:13,
> > from ./include/linux/iopoll.h:14,
> > from ./include/linux/regmap.h:20,
> > from drivers/reset/reset-intel-gw.c:12:
> > ./arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/platform.h:25:0: note: this is the
> > location of the previous definition
> > #define REG_OFFSET 3
> >
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <l...@intel.com>
> > Fixes: e44ab4e14d6f4 ("regmap: Simplify implementation of the
> > regmap_read_poll_timeout() macro")
>
> Hm, shouldn't this rather be:
>
> Fixes: c9aef213e38c ("reset: intel: Add system reset controller driver")
>
> even though e44ab4e14d6f4 triggered the issue by including iopoll.h?
>
Ok.
> > Signed-off-by: Dejin Zheng <zhengdej...@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/reset/reset-intel-gw.c | 8 ++++----
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-intel-gw.c b/drivers/reset/reset-intel-gw.c
> > index 854238444616..5cfb4892b399 100644
> > --- a/drivers/reset/reset-intel-gw.c
> > +++ b/drivers/reset/reset-intel-gw.c
> > @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
> > #define RCU_RST_STAT 0x0024
> > #define RCU_RST_REQ 0x0048
> >
> > -#define REG_OFFSET GENMASK(31, 16)
> > +#define REG_OFFSET_MASK GENMASK(31, 16)
> > #define BIT_OFFSET GENMASK(15, 8)
> > #define STAT_BIT_OFFSET GENMASK(7, 0)
>
> Could you add the _MASK suffix to BIT_OFFSET and STAT_BIT_OFFSET as
> well, for consistency?
>
I will add it in next patch version. Thanks!
BR,
Dejin
> regards
> Philipp
