On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 02:28:17PM -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
> On Thu Jun 25 20, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > Re-allocate context and session buffers when needed. Scale them in page
> > increments so that the reallocation is only seldomly required, and thus
> > causes minimal stress to the system. Add a static maximum limit of four
> > pages for buffer sizes.
> >
> > Cc: James Bottomley <james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com>
> > Suggested-by: Stefan Berger <stef...@linux.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakki...@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > Tested only for compilation.
> > v2: TPM2_SPACE_DEFAULT_BUFFER_SIZE
> > drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-space.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > include/linux/tpm.h | 6 ++-
> > 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-space.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-space.c
> > index 982d341d8837..b8ece01d6afb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-space.c
> > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-space.c
> > @@ -15,6 +15,9 @@
> > #include <asm/unaligned.h>
> > #include "tpm.h"
> >
> > +#define TPM2_SPACE_DEFAULT_BUFFER_SIZE PAGE_SIZE
> > +#define TPM2_SPACE_MAX_BUFFER_SIZE (4 * PAGE_SIZE)
> > +
> > enum tpm2_handle_types {
> > TPM2_HT_HMAC_SESSION = 0x02000000,
> > TPM2_HT_POLICY_SESSION = 0x03000000,
> > @@ -40,16 +43,21 @@ static void tpm2_flush_sessions(struct tpm_chip *chip,
> > struct tpm_space *space)
> >
> > int tpm2_init_space(struct tpm_space *space)
> > {
> > - space->context_buf = kzalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + space->context_buf = kzalloc(TPM2_SPACE_DEFAULT_BUFFER_SIZE,
> > + GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!space->context_buf)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > - space->session_buf = kzalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + space->session_buf = kzalloc(TPM2_SPACE_DEFAULT_BUFFER_SIZE,
> > + GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (space->session_buf == NULL) {
> > kfree(space->context_buf);
> > + space->context_buf = NULL;
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > }
> >
> > + space->context_size = TPM2_SPACE_DEFAULT_BUFFER_SIZE;
> > + space->session_size = TPM2_SPACE_DEFAULT_BUFFER_SIZE;
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -116,11 +124,13 @@ static int tpm2_load_context(struct tpm_chip *chip,
> > u8 *buf,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static int tpm2_save_context(struct tpm_chip *chip, u32 handle, u8 *buf,
> > - unsigned int buf_size, unsigned int *offset)
> > +static int tpm2_save_context(struct tpm_chip *chip, u32 handle, u8 **buf,
> > + unsigned int *buf_size, unsigned int *offset)
> > {
> > - struct tpm_buf tbuf;
> > + unsigned int new_buf_size;
> > unsigned int body_size;
> > + struct tpm_buf tbuf;
> > + void *new_buf;
> > int rc;
> >
> > rc = tpm_buf_init(&tbuf, TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS, TPM2_CC_CONTEXT_SAVE);
> > @@ -131,31 +141,48 @@ static int tpm2_save_context(struct tpm_chip *chip,
> > u32 handle, u8 *buf,
> >
> > rc = tpm_transmit_cmd(chip, &tbuf, 0, NULL);
> > if (rc < 0) {
> > - dev_warn(&chip->dev, "%s: failed with a system error %d\n",
> > - __func__, rc);
> > - tpm_buf_destroy(&tbuf);
> > - return -EFAULT;
> > + rc = -EFAULT;
> > + goto err;
> > } else if (tpm2_rc_value(rc) == TPM2_RC_REFERENCE_H0) {
> > - tpm_buf_destroy(&tbuf);
> > - return -ENOENT;
> > + rc = -ENOENT;
> > + goto out;
> > } else if (rc) {
> > - dev_warn(&chip->dev, "%s: failed with a TPM error 0x%04X\n",
> > - __func__, rc);
> > - tpm_buf_destroy(&tbuf);
> > - return -EFAULT;
> > + rc = -EFAULT;
> > + goto err;
> > }
> >
>
> Would it be worthwhile to still output something here since it is changing
> the value of rc returned from tpm_transmit_cmd()? Wondering if it would
> be useful for debugging to know what the returned error was. Other than
> that question looks good to me pending what is decided on using PAGE_SIZE.
>
> Regards,
> Jerry
I'll submit a new version that will just allocate a static buffer of 16
kB. Dynamic scaling is saved for future.
/Jarkko
