On 20.06.20 03:49, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 5:59 AM David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Commit e900a918b098 ("mm: shuffle initial free memory to improve
>> memory-side-cache utilization") promised "autodetection of a
>> memory-side-cache (to be added in a follow-on patch)" over a year ago.
>>
>> The original series included patches [1], however, they were dropped
>> during review [2] to be followed-up later.
>>
>> Due to lack of platforms that publish an HMAT, autodetection is currently
>> not implemented. However, manual activation is actively used [3]. Let's
>> simplify for now and re-add when really (ever?) needed.
>>
>> [1]
>> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/154510700291.1941238.817190985966612531.st...@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
>> [2]
>> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/154690326478.676627.103843791978176914.st...@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
>> [3]
>> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAPcyv4irwGUU2x+c6b4L=kbb1dnasnkaazd6ospyjl9kfsn...@mail.gmail.com
>>
>> Cc: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
>> Cc: Johannes Weiner <han...@cmpxchg.org>
>> Cc: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com>
>> Cc: Minchan Kim <minc...@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.hu...@intel.com>
>> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiy...@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgor...@techsingularity.net>
>> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.willi...@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> mm/shuffle.c | 28 ++--------------------------
>> mm/shuffle.h | 17 -----------------
>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/shuffle.c b/mm/shuffle.c
>> index dd13ab851b3ee..9b5cd4b004b0f 100644
>> --- a/mm/shuffle.c
>> +++ b/mm/shuffle.c
>> @@ -10,33 +10,11 @@
>> #include "shuffle.h"
>>
>> DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(page_alloc_shuffle_key);
>> -static unsigned long shuffle_state __ro_after_init;
>> -
>> -/*
>> - * Depending on the architecture, module parameter parsing may run
>> - * before, or after the cache detection. SHUFFLE_FORCE_DISABLE prevents,
>> - * or reverts the enabling of the shuffle implementation. SHUFFLE_ENABLE
>> - * attempts to turn on the implementation, but aborts if it finds
>> - * SHUFFLE_FORCE_DISABLE already set.
>> - */
>> -__meminit void page_alloc_shuffle(enum mm_shuffle_ctl ctl)
>> -{
>> - if (ctl == SHUFFLE_FORCE_DISABLE)
>> - set_bit(SHUFFLE_FORCE_DISABLE, &shuffle_state);
>> -
>> - if (test_bit(SHUFFLE_FORCE_DISABLE, &shuffle_state)) {
>> - if (test_and_clear_bit(SHUFFLE_ENABLE, &shuffle_state))
>> - static_branch_disable(&page_alloc_shuffle_key);
>> - } else if (ctl == SHUFFLE_ENABLE
>> - && !test_and_set_bit(SHUFFLE_ENABLE, &shuffle_state))
>> - static_branch_enable(&page_alloc_shuffle_key);
>> -}
>>
>> static bool shuffle_param;
>> static int shuffle_show(char *buffer, const struct kernel_param *kp)
>> {
>> - return sprintf(buffer, "%c\n", test_bit(SHUFFLE_ENABLE,
>> &shuffle_state)
>> - ? 'Y' : 'N');
>> + return sprintf(buffer, "%c\n", shuffle_param ? 'Y' : 'N');
>> }
>>
>> static __meminit int shuffle_store(const char *val,
>> @@ -47,9 +25,7 @@ static __meminit int shuffle_store(const char *val,
>> if (rc < 0)
>> return rc;
>> if (shuffle_param)
>> - page_alloc_shuffle(SHUFFLE_ENABLE);
>> - else
>> - page_alloc_shuffle(SHUFFLE_FORCE_DISABLE);
>> + static_branch_enable(&page_alloc_shuffle_key);
>> return 0;
>> }
>
> Let's do proper input validation here and require 1 / 'true' to enable
> shuffling and not also allow 0 to be an 'enable' value.
I don't think that's currently done?
param_set_bool(val, kp) will only default val==NULL to 'true'. Passing 0
will properly be handled by strtobool(). Or am I missing something?
Thanks!
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
