Hi,

 Is there anyone maintaining defxx these days?

 The defxx driver does a null pointer derefence if a system is short on
memory.  This happens repeatably on a 32MB machine if fsck is run just
befor loading the driver (not an unusual event upon startup and a quite
nasty one).

 The driver should check for a null pointer, obviously and the following
patch does.  Anyway, as the driver allocates quite an amount of memory
chances are it will fail to get it so I decided to call schedule() so that
temporary buffers might get freed.  Otherwise chances are it would never
succeed on a busy system.  It succeeds after ~50 iterations on my system.

 If anyone has a better idea, I would be pleased to hear it.

  Maciej

-- 
+  Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland   +
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+        e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], PGP key available        +

patch-2.4.0-defxx-1
diff -up --recursive --new-file linux-2.4.0.macro/drivers/net/defxx.c 
linux-2.4.0/drivers/net/defxx.c
--- linux-2.4.0.macro/drivers/net/defxx.c       Tue Sep  5 19:57:51 2000
+++ linux-2.4.0/drivers/net/defxx.c     Sun Jan  7 22:56:21 2001
@@ -2709,7 +2709,10 @@ static void dfx_rcv_init(DFX_board_t *bp
                        struct sk_buff *newskb;
                        bp->descr_block_virt->rcv_data[i+j].long_0 = (u32) 
(PI_RCV_DESCR_M_SOP |
                                ((PI_RCV_DATA_K_SIZE_MAX / PI_ALIGN_K_RCV_DATA_BUFF) 
<< PI_RCV_DESCR_V_SEG_LEN));
-                       newskb = dev_alloc_skb(NEW_SKB_SIZE);
+                       while (!(newskb = dev_alloc_skb(NEW_SKB_SIZE))) {
+                               printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: Could not allocate receive 
+buffer.\n", bp->dev->name);
+                               schedule();
+                       }
                        /*
                         * align to 128 bytes for compatibility with
                         * the old EISA boards.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to