On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 11:07:50 +0200 Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW, as a rule of thumb, I am ignoring patches that are sent to the > LKML in addition to the i2c list. If you think that your patch is so > important that it has to be send to a list with over 4500 subscribers > that sees 120.000 messages each year, then who am I to dare to comment > on it? > > If you want me to consider your patches as something that needs my > attention, send them to the i2c list only, do not add LKML. This is > general advice for everyone sending i2c patches, not just you, of > course. Disagree. I don't think there's any benefit to anyone for developers to hide their stuff on remote mailing lists. Copying lkml increases the changes that someone will spot a bug or some improvement and it generally keeps people informed as to what's going on. yeah, 120,000 messages/year. But a lot of them are just noise. Patches are important. And I really don't understand this huffy attitude and putting more roadblocks in the way of our contributors. People like Bryan are doing a lot of work to improve Linux and most people are (or should be) grateful for that and should be prepared to go the extra yard to help them. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
