On 17/06/20 13:17, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> From: Scott Wood <sw...@redhat.com>
>
> This function is concerned with the long-term cpu mask, not the
> transitory mask the task might have while migrate disabled. Before
> this patch, if a task was migrate disabled at the time
> __set_cpus_allowed_ptr() was called, and the new mask happened to be
> equal to the cpu that the task was running on, then the mask update
> would be lost.
>
> Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <sw...@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bige...@linutronix.de>
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -1637,7 +1637,7 @@ static int __set_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct
> goto out;
> }
>
> - if (cpumask_equal(p->cpus_ptr, new_mask))
> + if (cpumask_equal(&p->cpus_mask, new_mask))
> goto out;
>
> /*
Makes sense, but what about the rest of the checks? Further down there is
/* Can the task run on the task's current CPU? If so, we're done */
if (cpumask_test_cpu(task_cpu(p), new_mask))
goto out;
If the task is currently migrate disabled and for some stupid reason it
gets affined elsewhere, we could try to move it out - which AFAICT we don't
want to do because migrate disabled. So I suppose you'd want an extra
bailout condition here when the task is migrate disabled.
ISTR in RT you do re-check the affinity and potentially move the task away
when re-enabling migration, so that should work out all fine.
