On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 03:40:04PM +0200, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> Hi Suresh,
> 
> Thanks for your persistent work!
> 
> On 2020-06-08 12:25:03 +0900, Suresh Udipi wrote:
> > hsfreqrange should be chosen based on the calculated mbps which
> > is closer to the default bit rate  and within the range as per
> > table[1]. But current calculation always selects first value which
> > is greater than or equal to the calculated mbps which may lead
> > to chosing a wrong range in some cases.
> > 
> > For example for 360 mbps for H3/M3N
> > Existing logic selects
> > Calculated value 360Mbps : Default 400Mbps Range [368.125 -433.125 mbps]
> > 
> > This hsfreqrange is out of range.
> > 
> > The logic is changed to get the default value which is closest to the
> > calculated value [1]
> > 
> > Calculated value 360Mbps : Default 350Mbps  Range [320.625 -380.625 mpbs]
> > 
> > [1] specs r19uh0105ej0200-r-car-3rd-generation.pdf [Table 25.9]
> > 
> > Please note that According to Renesas in Table 25.9 the range for
> > 220 default value is corrected as below
> > 
> >  |Range (Mbps)     |  Default  Bit rate (Mbps) |
> >  -----------------------------------------------
> >  | 197.125-244.125 |     220                   |
> >  -----------------------------------------------
> > 
> > Fixes: 769afd212b16 ("media: rcar-csi2: add Renesas R-Car MIPI CSI-2 
> > receiver driver")
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Suresh Udipi <sud...@jp.adit-jv.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Kazuyoshi Akiyama <akiy...@nds-osk.co.jp>
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Rodin <mro...@de.adit-jv.com>
> > ---
> >  Changes in v2:
> >   - Added the boundary check for the maximum bit rate.
> > 
> >   - Simplified the logic by remmoving range check
> >     as only the closest default value covers most
> >     of the use cases.
> > 
> >   - Aligning the commit message based on the above change
> > 
> > 
> >  Changes in v3:
> >     - Added max member from struct rcsi2_mbps_reg.
> >       mbps varialbe cannot be removed from rcsi2_mbps_reg,
> >       since this structure is reused for
> >       phtw_mbps_h3_v3h_m3n/phtw_mbps_v3m_e3 where mbps is
> >       used.
> > 
> > 
> >    -  Update the walk of the array in rcsi2_set_phypll() so that it finds
> >       the first entry where the calculated bit rate is less than the max.
> > 
> >    - Support lower bit rates less than 80Mbps like 48Mbps
> >      (Raspberry pi camera 640x480 connected to Kingfisher)
> >      can also be supported by selecting the lowest default bit rate 80Mbps
> >      as done before this fix
> > 
> >    - Alignement of the commit message based on above changes.
> > 
> >  Changes in v4:
> >   -  Remove unncessary braces.
> > 
> >  Changes in v5:
> >    - Removed mbps variable in rcsi2_mbps_reg and aligned all 
> >      tables accordingly
> >      
> >  Changes in v6
> >    - Renesas correct the range of default value 220Mbps. Now
> >      if we select the nearest value to the default value all
> >      the values are in range. So reverting back to original patch
> >      
> >    - Added warning for values less than Minimum 80Mbps
> > 
> > 
> >  drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-csi2.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-csi2.c 
> > b/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-csi2.c
> > index 151e6a9..8c502b7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-csi2.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-csi2.c
> > @@ -199,6 +199,8 @@ static const struct rcsi2_mbps_reg phtw_mbps_v3m_e3[] = 
> > {
> >  /* PHY Frequency Control */
> >  #define PHYPLL_REG                 0x68
> >  #define PHYPLL_HSFREQRANGE(n)              ((n) << 16)
> > +#define PHYPLL_HSFREQRANGE_MAX             1500
> > +#define PHYPLL_HSFREQRANGE_MIN               80
> >  
> >  static const struct rcsi2_mbps_reg hsfreqrange_h3_v3h_m3n[] = {
> >     { .mbps =   80, .reg = 0x00 },
> > @@ -431,16 +433,27 @@ static int rcsi2_wait_phy_start(struct rcar_csi2 
> > *priv)
> >  static int rcsi2_set_phypll(struct rcar_csi2 *priv, unsigned int mbps)
> >  {
> >     const struct rcsi2_mbps_reg *hsfreq;
> > +   const struct rcsi2_mbps_reg *hsfreq_prev = NULL;
> >  
> > -   for (hsfreq = priv->info->hsfreqrange; hsfreq->mbps != 0; hsfreq++)
> > -           if (hsfreq->mbps >= mbps)
> > -                   break;
> > -
> > -   if (!hsfreq->mbps) {
> > +   if (mbps > PHYPLL_HSFREQRANGE_MAX) {
> >             dev_err(priv->dev, "Unsupported PHY speed (%u Mbps)", mbps);
> >             return -ERANGE;
> >     }
> >  
> > +   if (mbps < PHYPLL_HSFREQRANGE_MIN)
> > +           dev_warn(priv->dev, "PHY speed (%u Mbps) less \
> > +                    than Min 80Mbps\n", mbps);
> 
> I would drop this warning.
> 

  This was suggested by Michael. Michael is it ok to drop this warning
  as it is not available before this changes also. 

> > +
> > +   for (hsfreq = priv->info->hsfreqrange; hsfreq->mbps != 0; hsfreq++) {
> > +           if (hsfreq->mbps >= mbps)
> > +                   break;
> > +           hsfreq_prev = hsfreq;
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   if (hsfreq_prev &&
> > +       ((mbps - hsfreq_prev->mbps) <= (hsfreq->mbps - mbps)))
> 
> Longer lines are now OK [1] and I think it would add to the readability 
> here.
> 
> > +           hsfreq = hsfreq_prev;
> > +
> 
> How about
> 
> static int rcsi2_set_phypll(struct rcar_csi2 *priv, unsigned int mbps)
> {
>     const struct rcsi2_mbps_reg *hsfreq;
>     const struct rcsi2_mbps_reg *hsfreq_prev = NULL;
> 
>     for (hsfreq = priv->info->hsfreqrange; hsfreq->mbps != 0; hsfreq++) {
>       if (hsfreq->mbps >= mbps)
>               break;
>       hsfreq_prev = hsfreq;
>     }
> 
>     if (!hsfreq->mbps) {
>       dev_err(priv->dev, "Unsupported PHY speed (%u Mbps)", mbps);
>       return -ERANGE;
>     }
> 
>     if (hsfreq_prev && ((mbps - hsfreq_prev->mbps) <= (hsfreq->mbps - mbps)))
>       hsfreq = hsfreq_prev;
> 
>     rcsi2_write(priv, PHYPLL_REG, PHYPLL_HSFREQRANGE(hsfreq->reg));
> 
>     return 0;
> }
> 
> >     rcsi2_write(priv, PHYPLL_REG, PHYPLL_HSFREQRANGE(hsfreq->reg));
> >  
> >     return 0;

Agreed I will do the changes and update.
> > -- 
> > 2.7.4
> > 
> 
> 1. https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/29/1038
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Niklas Söderlund

-- 
Best Regards,
Suresh Udipi.

Reply via email to