On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 11:10 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > >
> > > #define read_seqbegin_irqsave(lock, flags) \
> > > -do { \
> > > +({ \
> > > flags = PICK_SEQ_OP_RET(__read_seqbegin_irqsave_raw, \
> > > __read_seqbegin_irqsave, lock); \
> > > -} while (0)
> > > + read_seqbegin(lock); \
> > > +})
>
> Yes, definitely the raw and unraw functions should be called
> local_irqsave_raw or something else that makes this obvious to what it
> is doing.
Hmm.. I'm not sure what else to name them .. Since it's in the seqlock.h
I don't think it should be called anything "local_irq*" .. It could be
seq_irqsave_{raw} .
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
