Hi Tao,
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 4:01 PM Tao Zhou <ouwen...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> After commit ab93a4bc955b, cfs_b->distribute_running is not used and
> removed. The lock/unlock protecting it are not removed and remain in
> the code. One benefit of removing them is that it can elimite the code
> size a little.
>
> Fixes: ab93a4bc955b ("sched/fair: Remove distribute_running from CFS
> bandwidth")
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 35f4cc024dcf..cc2e1e839e03 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -5089,9 +5089,6 @@ static void do_sched_cfs_slack_timer(struct
> cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b)
> return;
>
> distribute_cfs_runtime(cfs_b);
> -
> - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cfs_b->lock, flags);
> - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cfs_b->lock, flags);
> }
Thanks, I missed the now-useless lock acquire in my revert.
s/elimite/eliminate
Reviewed-by: Josh Don <josh...@google.com>
Best,
Josh
