On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, David Ford wrote:
> Distributions should be encouraged to use ip rather than ifconfig/route. It
> works better and does more, the output is more informative, more concise,
> and less confusing. It doesn't take that much more disk space than ifconfig
> and route does, ifconfig and route take 74K, ip takes 89K. I don't think 15k
> of disk space is sufficient concern, given that inodes are probably page
> size.
Actually if you count arp which is also part of ip; ip becomes smaller
by about 15K.
cheers,
jamal
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
