On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 03:30:13PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> TBH I am not sure it's worth a new header file for a routine that is
> only called from assembly (and never returns). I'd just add the
> prototype right above function definition, with a comment describing
> why.
Right, that works too.
> I see a few examples of this in the tree. Or maybe we even have an
> attribute for this case?
Not that I'm aware of.
> (I also suspect the same may be needed for xen_prepare_pvh() BTW).
Yeah, Benni is working through the rest of them. Btw, the final goal of
this whole work is to enable -Wmissing-prototypes by default on x86.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
