On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 12:25:50PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > CONFIG_FTRACE_WITH_REGS does not exist as a Kconfig symbol. > > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <j...@perches.com> > --- > > I don't have the hardware, so I can't tell if this is a > correct change, but it is a logical one. > > Found by a test script that looks for IS_ENABLED(FOO) > where FOO must also exist in Kconfig files. > > arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c > index 8618faa82e6d..86a5cf9bc19a 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c > @@ -69,7 +69,8 @@ static struct plt_entry *get_ftrace_plt(struct module *mod, > unsigned long addr) > > if (addr == FTRACE_ADDR) > return &plt[FTRACE_PLT_IDX]; > - if (addr == FTRACE_REGS_ADDR && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FTRACE_WITH_REGS)) > + if (addr == FTRACE_REGS_ADDR && > + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS)) > return &plt[FTRACE_REGS_PLT_IDX];
Ha! So much for 100-char lines ;) (fix looks good to me, I'll queue it for -rc1) Will
