Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> <looks>
>
> OK, in ipv4_local_port_range() we have 
>
>                 if (range[1] <= range[0])
>                         ret = -EINVAL;
>
[...skipped...]

> : ip_local_port_range
> : -------------------
> :
> : Range of  ports  used  by  TCP  and UDP to choose the local port. Contains 
> two
> : numbers, the  first  number  is the lowest port, the second number the 
> highest
> : local port.  Default  is  1024-4999.  Should  be  changed  to  32768-61000 
> for
> : high-usage systems.
>
> ie: inclusive.
>
> Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt says
>
> : ip_local_port_range - 2 INTEGERS
> :     Defines the local port range that is used by TCP and UDP to
> :     choose the local port. The first number is the first, the 
> :     second the last local port number. Default value depends on
> :     amount of memory available on the system:
> :     > 128Mb 32768-61000
> :     < 128Mb 1024-4999 or even less.
> :     This number defines number of active connections, which this
> :     system can issue simultaneously to systems not supporting
> :     TCP extensions (timestamps). With tcp_tw_recycle enabled
> :     (i.e. by default) range 1024-4999 is enough to issue up to
> :     2000 connections per second to systems supporting timestamps.
>
> also inclusive.

  I'm also agree, that we should have an ability to use the same
minimum/maximum port number for the cases when we want to use only
one port.

-- 
Anton Arapov, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG Key ID: 0x6FA8C812

Attachment: pgp3XnyLwQgDx.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to