From: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:07:20 +0200
> looking at the dev.c code - can napi_struct->weight be zero > legitimately? If yes then the 0 gets passed to the driver and the driver > would return 1 - violating the assertion. I touched upon this in another reply. For forcedeth it should never be zero, it gets set in netif_napi_add() to RX_WORK_PER_LOOP which is unconditionally defined to 64. Afterwards napi->weight should never be modified and that is what is passed into n->poll(). Perhaps some memory scribble is causing it to be zero'd. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
