On Fri, 29 May 2020 00:16:22 +0900 Tetsuo Handa <penguin-ker...@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> wrote:
> On 2020/05/28 20:06, Petr Mladek wrote: > > Now, it requires lib/Kconfig.twist that is added by a patch in > > Andrew's tree. One approach is to push this into linux-next > > via Andrew's -mm tree. > > > > Another possibility would be to remove lib/Kconfig.twist > > changes from this patch and replace > > CONFIG_TWIST_ALWAYS_EVALUATE_PRINTK_ARGUMENTS with > > CONFIG_TWIST_FOR_SYZKALLER_TESTING. > > Then I could push it into linux-next via printk/linux.git tree. > > CONFIG_TWIST_FOR_SYZKALLER_TESTING is meant for linux-next only. > But CONFIG_TWIST_KERNEL_BEHAVIOR is meant for Linus's tree. > > That is, lib/Kconfig.twist will be there in printk/linux.git tree > after 5.8-rc1. But maybe twist related patches should be gathered > into one tree for easier management. Yup. I'll drop the twist patches from -mm.
