On 7 Jan 2001, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > Why don't you, as the other script suggested, execute libc.so.6? > Symlinks can be missing or can be wrong. I'll have a look at this shell script and take the best out of both to make a new one. BTW, lots of version dependencies found in older Changes document (i.e. for 2.3.11) were removed now (2.4.0 shows only 9 where the old one had 22). Have the removed ones been completely unnecessary? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] new bug report script Matthias Juchem
- Re: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] new bug report script Matthias Juchem
- Re: [PATCH] new bug report script Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] new bug report script Matthias Juchem
- Re: [PATCH] new bug report script Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] new bug report script Matthias Juchem
- Re: [PATCH] new bug report script David Ford
- Re: [PATCH] new bug report script Matthias Juchem
- Re: [PATCH] new bug report script Keith Owens
- Re: [PATCH] new bug report scrip... Ulrich Drepper
- Re: [PATCH] new bug report scrip... Matthias Juchem
- Re: [PATCH] new bug report scrip... Barry K. Nathan
- Re: [PATCH] new bug report script Russell King