On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 08:11:22PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> 
> 
> On 23/05/2020 17:51, Dejin Zheng wrote:
> > It will call devm_request_irq() after platform_get_irq() function
> > in many drivers, sometimes, it is not right for the error handling
> > of these two functions in some drivers. so provide this function
> > to simplify the driver.
> > 
> > Cc: Michal Simek <michal.si...@xilinx.com>
> > Cc: Wolfram Sang <w...@the-dreams.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Dejin Zheng <zhengdej...@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > v1 -> v2:
> >     - The patch content has not changed. just resend it by this discussion:
> >       
> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-i2c/patch/20200520144821.8069-1-zhengdej...@gmail.com/
> > 
> >   drivers/base/platform.c         | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   include/linux/platform_device.h |  4 ++++
> >   2 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
> > index c0d0a5490ac6..1d2fd1ea3bc5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/platform.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
> > @@ -275,6 +275,39 @@ int platform_irq_count(struct platform_device *dev)
> >   }
> >   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_irq_count);
> > +/**
> > + * devm_platform_request_irq - get an irq and allocate an interrupt
> > + *                         line for a managed device
> > + * @pdev: platform device
> > + * @num: IRQ number index
> > + * @irq: get an IRQ for a device if irq != NULL
> > + * @handler: function to be called when the IRQ occurs
> > + * @irqflags: interrupt type flags
> > + * @devname: an ascii name for the claiming device, dev_name(dev) if NULL
> > + * @dev_id: a cookie passed back to the handler function
> > + *
> > + * Return: zero on success, negative error number on failure.
> > + */
> > +int devm_platform_request_irq(struct platform_device *pdev, unsigned int 
> > num,
> > +           unsigned int *irq, irq_handler_t handler,
> > +           unsigned long irqflags, const char *devname, void *dev_id)
> > +{
> > +   int tmp_irq, ret;
> > +
> > +   tmp_irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, num);
> > +   if (tmp_irq < 0)
> > +           return tmp_irq;
> > +
> > +   ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, tmp_irq, handler, irqflags,
> > +                           devname, dev_id);
> > +   if (ret < 0)
> > +           dev_err(&pdev->dev, "can't request IRQ\n");
> > +   else if (irq != NULL)
> > +           *irq = tmp_irq;
> > +   return ret;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_platform_request_irq);
> > +
> >   /**
> >    * platform_get_resource_byname - get a resource for a device by name
> >    * @dev: platform device
> > diff --git a/include/linux/platform_device.h 
> > b/include/linux/platform_device.h
> > index 77a2aada106d..d94652deea5c 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/platform_device.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/platform_device.h
> > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> >   #define _PLATFORM_DEVICE_H_
> >   #include <linux/device.h>
> > +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> >   #define PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE       (-1)
> >   #define PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO       (-2)
> > @@ -70,6 +71,9 @@ devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(struct 
> > platform_device *pdev,
> >   extern int platform_get_irq(struct platform_device *, unsigned int);
> >   extern int platform_get_irq_optional(struct platform_device *, unsigned 
> > int);
> >   extern int platform_irq_count(struct platform_device *);
> > +extern int devm_platform_request_irq(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > +           unsigned int num, unsigned int *irq, irq_handler_t handler,
> > +           unsigned long irqflags, const char *devname, void *dev_id);
> 
> 
> it has to be documented in devres.rst
>
Grygorii, Thnaks! I will add it in patch v3.

BTW, the Gmail will prevent me sending messages to a large number of
recipients, So I reduced some recipients, but still retained i2c and
linux kernel mail list. sorry!

BR,
Dejin

> >   extern struct resource *platform_get_resource_byname(struct 
> > platform_device *,
> >                                                  unsigned int,
> >                                                  const char *);
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> grygorii

Reply via email to