On 7 Jan, Alan Cox wrote: >> Um, what about people running their box as just a VLAN router/firewall? >> That seems to be one of the principle uses so far. Actually, in that case >> both VLAN and IP traffic would come through, so it would be a tie if VLAN >> came first, but non-vlan traffic would suffer worse. > > Why would someone filter between vlans when any node on each vlan can happily > ignore the vlan partitioning > You might be connected to a vlan capable switch which will only feed the `right' vlan to a certain port... In this case an one-armed firewall might make sense. /Daniel -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus... David S. Miller
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet ... Matti Aarnio
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT m... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does N... Matti Aarnio
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet ... Ben Greear
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT m... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does N... Ben Greear
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does N... Matti Aarnio
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does N... 5116
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does N... David Ford
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does N... Christopher E. Brown
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Do... Ben Greear
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT m... jamal
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does N... Ben Greear
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does N... Matti Aarnio