On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 06:42:31PM +0200, Jessica Yu wrote:
> +++ Luis Chamberlain [15/05/20 21:28 +0000]:
> > Device driver firmware can crash, and sometimes, this can leave your
> > system in a state which makes the device or subsystem completely
> > useless. Detecting this by inspecting /proc/sys/kernel/tainted instead
> > of scraping some magical words from the kernel log, which is driver
> > specific, is much easier. So instead provide a helper which lets drivers
> > annotate this.
> >
> > Once this happens, scrapers can easily look for modules taint flags
> > for a firmware crash. This will taint both the kernel and respective
> > calling module.
> >
> > The new helper module_firmware_crashed() uses LOCKDEP_STILL_OK as this
> > fact should in no way shape or form affect lockdep. This taint is device
> > driver specific.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcg...@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > Documentation/admin-guide/tainted-kernels.rst | 6 ++++++
> > include/linux/kernel.h | 3 ++-
> > include/linux/module.h | 13 +++++++++++++
> > include/trace/events/module.h | 3 ++-
> > kernel/module.c | 5 +++--
> > kernel/panic.c | 1 +
> > tools/debugging/kernel-chktaint | 7 +++++++
> > 7 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/tainted-kernels.rst
> > b/Documentation/admin-guide/tainted-kernels.rst
> > index 71e9184a9079..92530f1d60ae 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/tainted-kernels.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/tainted-kernels.rst
> > @@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ Bit Log Number Reason that got the kernel tainted
> > 15 _/K 32768 kernel has been live patched
> > 16 _/X 65536 auxiliary taint, defined for and used by distros
> > 17 _/T 131072 kernel was built with the struct randomization plugin
> > + 18 _/Q 262144 driver firmware crash annotation
> > === === ====== ========================================================
> >
> > Note: The character ``_`` is representing a blank in this table to make
> > reading
> > @@ -162,3 +163,8 @@ More detailed explanation for tainting
> > produce extremely unusual kernel structure layouts (even performance
> > pathological ones), which is important to know when debugging. Set at
> > build time.
> > +
> > + 18) ``Q`` used by device drivers to annotate that the device driver's
> > firmware
> > + has crashed and the device's operation has been severely affected. The
> > + device may be left in a crippled state, requiring full driver removal
> > /
> > + addition, system reboot, or it is unclear how long recovery will take.
> > diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
> > index 04a5885cec1b..19e1541c82c7 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/kernel.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
> > @@ -601,7 +601,8 @@ extern enum system_states {
> > #define TAINT_LIVEPATCH 15
> > #define TAINT_AUX 16
> > #define TAINT_RANDSTRUCT 17
> > -#define TAINT_FLAGS_COUNT 18
> > +#define TAINT_FIRMWARE_CRASH 18
> > +#define TAINT_FLAGS_COUNT 19
> >
> > struct taint_flag {
> > char c_true; /* character printed when tainted */
> > diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h
> > index 2c2e988bcf10..221200078180 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/module.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/module.h
> > @@ -697,6 +697,14 @@ static inline bool is_livepatch_module(struct module
> > *mod)
> > bool is_module_sig_enforced(void);
> > void set_module_sig_enforced(void);
> >
> > +void add_taint_module(struct module *mod, unsigned flag,
> > + enum lockdep_ok lockdep_ok);
> > +
> > +static inline void module_firmware_crashed(void)
> > +{
> > + add_taint_module(THIS_MODULE, TAINT_FIRMWARE_CRASH, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK);
> > +}
>
> Just a nit: I think module_firmware_crashed() is a confusing name - it
> doesn't really tell me what it's doing, and it's not really related to
> the rest of the module_* symbols, which mostly have to do with module
> loader/module specifics. Especially since a driver can be built-in, too.
> How about taint_firmware_crashed() or something similar?
Sure.
> Also, I think we might crash in add_taint_module() if a driver is
> built into the kernel, because THIS_MODULE will be null and there is
> no null pointer check in add_taint_module(). We could unify the
> CONFIG_MODULES and !CONFIG_MODULES stubs and either add an `if (mod)`
> check in add_taint_module() or add an #ifdef MODULE check in the stub
> itself to call add_taint() or add_taint_module() as appropriate. Hope
> that makes sense.
I had to do something a bit different but I think you'll agree with it.
Will include it in my next iteration.
Luis
