Hi!
> To fix that, the initial attempt was to mark the one function which
> generates the stack canary with:
>
> __attribute__((optimize("-fno-stack-protector"))) ... start_secondary(void
> *unused)
>
> however, using the optimize attribute doesn't work cumulatively
> as the attribute does not add to but rather replaces previously
> supplied optimization options - roughly all -fxxx options.
>
> The key one among them being -fno-omit-frame-pointer and thus leading to
> not present frame pointer - frame pointer which the kernel needs.
>
> The next attempt to prevent compilers from tail-call optimizing
> the last function call cpu_startup_entry(), shy of carving out
> start_secondary() into a separate compilation unit and building it with
> -fno-stack-protector, was to add an empty asm("").
>
> This current solution was short and sweet, and reportedly, is supported
> by both compilers but we didn't get very far this time: future (LTO?)
> optimization passes could potentially eliminate this, which leads us
> to the third attempt: having an actual memory barrier there which the
> compiler cannot ignore or move around etc.
>
> That should hold for a long time, but hey we said that about the other
> two solutions too so...
You need compiler barrier, but mb() compiles down to
asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE("lock; addl $0,-4(%%esp)", "mfence", \
X86_FEATURE_XMM2)
:::
"memory",
"cc")
I believe that is a bit of overkill.
I see that empty asm("") is not effective. asm volatile("", :::
"memory") should be effective, AFAICT. You should be able to use
existing barrier() macro.
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h#L20
Best regards,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
