Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Putting the LFS checks, & max filesize checks into the VFS sounds > > right for 2.4.x because it fixes lots of filesystems, with just a > > couple of lines of code. > > Rather more than that, and it only fixes those using generic_file_* True. But it is noticeable fewer lines of code than doing it all once for each fs. Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: ramfs problem... (unlink o... Chris Mason
- Re: ramfs problem... (unlink o... Alexander Viro
- Re: ramfs problem... (unlink o... Alan Cox
- Re: ramfs problem... (unlink o... Andreas Dilger
- Re: ramfs problem... (unlink o... Alexander Viro
- Re: ramfs problem... (unlink o... Andreas Dilger
- Re: ramfs problem... (unlink o... David Woodhouse
- Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D&q... Alan Cox
- Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in &quo... Eric W. Biederman
- Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in ... Alan Cox
- Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file... Eric W. Biederman
- Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D&q... Alan Cox
- Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D&q... Alan Cox
- Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D&q... Alexander Viro
- Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D&q... Alan Cox
- Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D&q... Andries . Brouwer