From: Jianchao Wang <[email protected]>

commit f5bbbbe4d63577026f908a809f22f5fd5a90ea1f upstream.

For blk-mq, part_in_flight/rw will invoke blk_mq_in_flight/rw to
account the inflight requests. It will access the queue_hw_ctx and
nr_hw_queues w/o any protection. When updating nr_hw_queues and
blk_mq_in_flight/rw occur concurrently, panic comes up.

Before update nr_hw_queues, the q will be frozen. So we could use
q_usage_counter to avoid the race. percpu_ref_is_zero is used here
so that we will not miss any in-flight request. The access to
nr_hw_queues and queue_hw_ctx in blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter are
under rcu critical section, __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues could use
synchronize_rcu to ensure the zeroed q_usage_counter to be globally
visible.

--------------
NOTE: Back-ported to 4.4.y.

The upstream commit was intended to prevent concurrent manipulation of
nr_hw_queues and iteration over queues. The former doesn't happen in
this in 4.4.7 (as __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues doesn't exist). The
extra locking is also buggy in this commit but fixed in a follow-up.

It may protect against other concurrent accesses such as queue removal
by synchronising RCU locking around q_usage_counter.
--------------

Signed-off-by: Jianchao Wang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Giuliano Procida <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
 block/blk-mq-tag.c |   10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
@@ -481,6 +481,14 @@ void blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter(struct r
        struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
        int i;
 
+       /*
+        * Avoid potential races with things like queue removal.
+        */
+       rcu_read_lock();
+       if (percpu_ref_is_zero(&q->q_usage_counter)) {
+               rcu_read_unlock();
+               return;
+       }
 
        queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) {
                struct blk_mq_tags *tags = hctx->tags;
@@ -497,7 +505,7 @@ void blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter(struct r
                bt_for_each(hctx, &tags->bitmap_tags, tags->nr_reserved_tags, 
fn, priv,
                      false);
        }
-
+       rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
 static unsigned int bt_unused_tags(struct blk_mq_bitmap_tags *bt)


Reply via email to