On 18-05-20, 13:16, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 18-05-20, 15:10, Xiongfeng Wang wrote:
> > 'freq_qos_update_request()' called by 'cpufreq_boost_set_sw()' reutrns 1
> > when the effective constraint value of frequency QoS has changed. It's
> > not an error code. So handle the return value 1 of '.set_boost()' in
> > 'cpufreq_boost_trigger_state()' properly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfe...@huawei.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 5 ++++-
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > index 4adac3a..bb6746e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > @@ -2540,7 +2540,10 @@ int cpufreq_boost_trigger_state(int state)
> > write_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
> >
> > ret = cpufreq_driver->set_boost(state);
> > - if (ret) {
> > + if (ret == 1) {
> > + pr_debug("The effective constraint value of frequency QoS has
> > changed.\n");
> > + return 0;
> > + } else if (ret) {
>
> Rafael, IMO it is better to pick patch from Sergey for this as this is
> implementation detail.
>
> > write_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
> > cpufreq_driver->boost_enabled = !state;
> > write_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
This is already fixed in the PM tree with a different patch Xiongfeng.
--
viresh
